Did You Know that Hoover was a Great President?

01月 6th, 2009

Good Morning Papamoka Bloggers - Well, the holidays are over - thank God - and now we begin to focus on the inauguration and the upcoming storm of activity by the new Obama Administration. Something tells me that’s it’s going to be a fascinating year of analyses, praise and criticism.Before we get to the more practical matters of turning the Bush DEPRESSION into a RECESSION, I would like to comment on the state of the far right, or what some might call their EXTREME DENIAL and lack of support for change. There are many reports, and lots of FOX “News” coverage, about how Obama will be making a mistake if he tries to be “too extreme” in his policies.They do credit him with appointing a “moderate” team so far, but they won’t stop criticizing him for plans to push FDR-like programs. You know, health care reform and stuff that WE AMERICANS voted him into office to fix.They also won’t stop repeating their BS about HOW he was elected. Did you know that he was elected due to “white guilt” and a strange and “irrational” hatred of George Bush, and not for his policies or “socialistic” ideas? I know, it’s news to me too. It seems they feel the American people really didn’t vote for change. I know, I know, WEIRD!Wow, it would appear the Republican far right has gone past denial into some sort of alternative universe. A good example of their extreme thinking erupted this Christmas with the release of a new CD by a leading contender to become chairman of the Republican Party, Chip Saltsman, featuring a parody song called Barack the Magic Negro. It’s repulsive, but many of them think it’s hilarious. I think it serves as a great port-hole into that other universe.I’m proud to say that many leading Republicans were horrified after he distributed the CD, but I’m less proud to report that a reasonable survey of right-wing websites and news organizations show comments very supportive of the parody. Rush Limbaugh LOVES it. It would appear that far right Republicans seem to have trouble distinguishing between good parody and racism.The Republican party needs to recover from HEAVY electoral defeats over the past two years, and it won’t survive unless it reaches out to younger and ethnically diverse voters. So, what is their method of recruiting such voters? To release a parody mocking Barack Obama’s ethnicity and skin color. Sung to the tune of Puff the Magic Dragon (also a parody), the lyrics have left most intelligent Republicans cringing.Chip Saltsman, a former leader of Tennessee Republicans, who is seeking to take over the party’s national committee, sent the CD to party members as a Christmas gift. But unlike him, few found it funny. Let’s hope that Chip finds a new career, better suited to his talents. How about sewer worker, or Tennessee Klan leader?Anyway, that CD is only one example. Others include the fact that Sarah Palin has been named “conservative of the year” by more far right Republican organizations than you can count. Just do a search, and you’ll find there are too many to name here. You don’t even hear John McCain being mentioned anymore.It’s all about her these days. The woman is an IGNORANT fool with little education and a love of killing things, and they love her. She knows NOTHING about the world, or the economy, and they LOVE her? What the hell is wrong with them? Did you know that her 2009 calender is a top seller on Amazon? Okay, I admit it, they scare the hell out of me.I’m also very disturbed by the right’s denial about America’s new faith in Obama. They seem to think it’s a media construct. They also keep saying they would have won the election if they had been “tougher,” and “stuck to their conservative principles more.” What the hell is wrong with the far right? They LOST because of that conservative hard-headedness. Most of America wants to come together, they want GOVERNMENT TO HELP THEM, and they refuse to see it.I know I shouldn’t care, because it is their funeral, but I still want to understand them. Why do they keep hitting their heads against brick walls? Why do they keep thinking that the majority of Americans want a Sarah Palin? Where are the polls that make them believe that BS? I don’t get it. It’s like 30% or more of the country is either retarded or mentally unstable, capable of believing whatever BS they want to.Oh well, I’ll have to let it go. Let’s just watch them bash, crash and burn. The majority of us will move on to fix the problems they created. They will do what they do. Just like the Republicans who praised Hoover for years after he left office, claiming that the roaring twenties were the best years of America, the far right will continue to sing the praises of Bush and claim that Obama does not represent the true America.The Bush Legacy Project will continue to spin, lie, and tell tall tales to small groups of Republicans who want to hear their version of history, because they don’t want to face the truth about what really happened. Did you know Hoover was a great president? They say history will vindicate them, but we all know it won’t. The rest of us can’t afford to wait for them; we have to get to work fixing things.Michael BohPapamoka’s Left Coast Contributorfrom Our Rants & Raves BlogThank you for reading Papamoka. Come back soon!

Pumpkins On Steroids

01月 6th, 2009

[#2: Edit Options>MightyAdsense>Adsense Code]

Every year they have this pumpkin weigh-off in Half Moon Bay, California. People come from all over the west coast with their pickup trucks loaded with gargantuan pumpkins that they have grown. The mutant gourds come in all sorts of shapes, sizes and colors. From lat ones that look like a blob of gum to nearly perfect orange ones that could be used as a giant jack-o-lantern. The smallest ones weigh in at about 185 pounds and the big winners usually tip the scales at around 1,500 pounds.The event technically starts at 7am when they start weighing pumpkins – the smallest ones first. For some insane reason I always get there right at 7 knowing full well that the thing won’t end until almost noon. The big prize winning pumpkins don’t even hit the scales until 10am at the earliest. The event rarely ends before 11:30. I wonder why so many people bring pumpkins that are in the 200-400 pound range. Its not like they are going to win anything. If I pulled up with my scrawny little-big pumpkin and saw one of those that is over a thousand pounds, I’d just keep on driving past the event and go make a dozen pumpkin pies at home.With the likelihood of the event going at least an hour over its scheduled time for completion, Fred Larson from the Chronicle ended up leaving to go shoot a more pressing assignment. Matt Sumner from the Bay Area News Group kept checking his watch as he was in danger of missing his next assignment if the weighing of the big ass pumpkins was delayed any longer. I will give credit to the organizers, they give us great access and pretty much let us do anything we want. Gotta love that.Workers brought out the “final four” on forklifts and raised them up for the crowd to see. Everyone ooooh’d and ahhh’d. Then, one by one, the massive mutations are lifted onto a scale and people cheer as the weight pops up on a little LCD screen. Some of the farmers react by pumping their fists. Others just stand there and mumble to themselves.The guy that won this year is the same guy that won last year. Thad Starr of Oregon crushed the competition with his big white blob that weighed in at 1528 pounds, 4 pounds better than one year ago. Mr. Starr’s celebration upon learning that he had won was anything but photogenic. It looked as if he had just got punched in the stomach as he hunched over and half pumped his fists. He needs a jube coach if he is gonna keep winning this contest.I was eavesdropping on an interview with the winner and he said that he spends hours each day babysitting the pumpkin as it grows and uses thousands of gallons of water over the 4 month growing period. There should be a doping agency that monitors these guys, I bet they probably use all kinds of Barry Bonds type growth enhancers to get these things as big as they are. Or, maybe they are just good at what they do, unlike me, the guy who can’t even grow tomatoes that get bigger than one inch. Mr. Black Thumb.

Kotaku’s 2008 Judges’ Choice Awards

01月 6th, 2009

[#3: Edit Options>MightyAdsense>Adsense Code]

Earlier today we posted our annual Game of the Year awards. The deserving winners were the results of group thought, discussion and vote. The Judge’s Awards, though, are all about one person’s choice. When we went through the process of picking our annual games of the year, I also asked each writer to nominate a single game for a judge’s choice award. The idea here is that each judge would get a chance to pull out a game they think was deserving of recognition, but perhaps not of any of the official awards. Their choices and reasoning follow: Judge’s Choice Awards Audiosurf Audiosurf takes any MP3 file you have and translates it into a rhythm-puzzle game that can be as fast-paced and frantic as an EBM tune or as relaxing as an easy listening selection. With variety limited only by your musical selection and community options that not only let you compare scores of friends and strangers but also helps you find people with similiar musical tastes, it really is the ultimate game for music afficianados. Bionic Commando: Rearmed The broadest measure of a video game’s excellence is also the simplest: “What was the most fun?” This year, Bionic Commando: Rearmed was the pound-for-pound champion of fun. Not, “thought-provoking,” not “awe-inspiring,” not “most visually stunning,” — just “I want to play this” fun. BCR flawlessly bridged the best of two generations, rendering the addictive, endlessly replayable world of the classic 8-bit platformer in the audiovisual tableau of a next-gen console — at a price cheaper than the original by half. KORG DS-10 KORG DS-10 is not a game at all. Straight up, it’s the Korg MS-10 synthesizer for the Nintendo DS. While mainstream music games let players pretend their making music, KORG DS-10 actually lets them make music. Mushroom Men: Spore Wars Mushroom Men: Spore Wars was the most fun I’ve had on the Wii in months. It offered a funny little story, interesting character design and amazing art and sound, all while still feeling very this generation. Spore Wars is a must have for any Wii gamer bemoaning the lack of traditional games on the platform. No More Heroes Grasshopper Manufacture probably didn’t get enough credit — or a proper slice of those outrageous Wii sales — for what it did right with No More Heroes. It nailed motion control, gave the Wii an original, mature-themed adventure and made the best of the platform’s horsepower, thanks to brilliant character design and cel-shaded visuals. No game was as squarely aimed at the hardcore gamer who happens to own a Wii, if only for the fact that its protagonist is the violent fantasy version of the geek playing it. Definitely the bloodiest Wii game of 2008. Persona 4 Persona 4 is the JRPG so nice, they made it twice. The gameplay system improves on the innovative dungeon-crawling/dating sim combo introduced in Persona 3 while introducing a fresh take on the tired teen-saves-the-town plot line. The characters are diverse and entertaining - and with the benefit of decent voice-acting, they really draw you into your character of the gray-haired transfer student instead of isolating you as a cliche. And even if you’re not into dungeon crawling or dating, the sheer amount of stuff to do in Persona 4 makes it well worth your money - something other $40 games on next-gen systems can’t seem to offer. Prince of Persia We tried to do our GOTY awards a little different this year. Reward developers, instead of informing purchasers. And for the most part, I think we succeeded (even if we don’t all agree on the ultimate winners). Oh, except for one thing: We didn’t have an award for bravery. I’d give that award to Prince of Persia. For taking “death” out of its stylish platformer. People have whined endlessly that it makes the game “easy”, that it cheapens the experience, that removing “death” removes all consequence from the game. Rubbish. All it does is save time, all it does is remove frustrating repetition the bane of a platformer - so all it really deserves is applause.

New Year’s Resolutions For The Game Industry

01月 6th, 2009

It’s the New Year, and that means it’s time for resolutions. You know, drop some weight, quit smoking, get organized - just like you resolve to do every year, right? It’s also a good time to reflect, maybe mull over some things you learned during the year and how you can apply those lessons in the coming one. How about the year for games? Just as predicted, 2008 was a high-volume year, and although a recent rash of layoffs and economic struggles for the games biz proved that we’re not “recession-proof,” video games as an industry and as an entertainment medium still made big strides forward. And what have we learned? New Year’s resolutions tend to last until about mid-January, but looking back on the year in games, why don’t we take a look at some resolutions we’d like to see ourselves - and the industry - actually keep? New Year’s Resolutions For The Game Industry No More Holiday Avalanches: Once the holiday season came around, there were so many great titles to choose from that we had no idea what to buy. That’s part of why it’s been so hard to have a decisive opinion on the year-end lineup of titles - even reviewers and critics couldn’t thoroughly keep pace with the barrage, and it was harder than ever to be the kind of core gamer who plays every title. There were just too many of them coming out at once. Why on earth would the industry’s publishers sync their calendars to launch their most competitive titles all at once? Well, the marketing wisdom goes something like this: Roll out a great game in a period of little competition, and consumers ask themselves whether or not they should buy it. Roll out a great game in a crowded, competitive season and consumers are more likely to ask themselves which title they should buy. That’s how movies do it, which is why you tend to see your Summer action flicks, your Spring romantic comedies, your Fall kids movies or your Holiday dramas come out in packs. The thinking is that more crowded release schedules draw consumers’ attention to the space, and actually seem to increase the chance that someone will spend money on something. But this season’s rapidly-encroaching economic constraints meant that only the “sure things” earned money - players knew what to expect from Gears 2 or CoD5, so that’s what they bought. Filling out the rest of the November NPD charts were the same mainstay Nintendo titles for Wii that more casual players have bought regularly throughout the year. While slightly more divergent, critically-acclaimed titles like Left 4 Dead, Fable II and Fallout 3 still made the top 20, they likely could have sold even better in a period where they were allowed to be the main event. And forget the titles that were any smaller than that — literally, do you even remember them? Publishers plan release schedules months, often years in advance, and no one could have predicted that the recession could hit so quick and so hard. But this year, we hope they’ll have a little more faith in their own titles, and in the audience’s appetite for innovation, and resolve to release at least a few of their gems when they can stand on their own, when audiences can pay proper attention to them, and when consumer wallets aren’t already bled to death. Less Is More: Even before the economic downturn set in, the industry was beginning to feel a serious squeeze from just how large development have gotten today. As the industry’s grown in value, it’s also become much more competitive, and major companies feel the need to sink millions into long, long dev cycles just to keep up. And profitability’s hard - analyst group EEDAR recently suggested that only 20 percent of games are profitable. Yes, that means that as much as 80 percent of games lose money. So what can the games biz do? Well, we’ve heard companies that would never before breathe the word “microtransactions” start grudgingly letting it slip. We’re seeing fewer hours on our big-budget game discs thanks to the promise of less-expensive DLC down the road, since publishers are hoping to develop games with “long tail” revenue potential. We’ve seen DRM get much stricter - even though industry organizations like like the ESA and the PC Gaming Alliance have yet to quantify with data just how much game piracy hurts sales, all they know is that it does - and that’s a reason to try and staunch the bleeding. Game publishers are starting to turn a sharper eye toward used game sales and trade-ins, too, trying to figure out how they can thwart the leech in revenue - at the consumer’s expense, if you listen to GameStop CEO Dan DeMatteo. These are all fairly viable strategies (though, while the games biz is at it, it could work a bit more on those DRM solutions) - but what about making better games with smaller budgets? That’s right - bigger isn’t always better. Every year, we see browser-based one-man shows or small-team titles like Daniel Benmergui’s I Wish I Were The Moon that awe and inspire, while two of the year’s biggest main market successes - Jon Blow’s Braid and 2D Boy’s World of Goo - were indie titles whose budget is likely a fraction of Cutting Edge FPS Vol. 29’s. What about the idea that clever design, artful animation and a dash of genuine spirit can sell just as well as a big-budget game - and at a much lower cost? Of course, we’ll always love our AAA blockbusters. But wouldn’t it be great if we could see the industry’s major leading companies also try a new paradigm, and possibly see more profits in the process? Skim the bloat - it’d be a win-win. Value Your Talent: You know the author of a book. You know the director of a film, and its major players. You know the names of the members of your favorite band, and if you’re a music buff, you might even know who inspired them. So why do we still have no real idea who makes our games? Sure, we’re often familiar with whoever’s name is on the project as director. You’ll see the publisher’s producer quoted constantly on a title you’re looking forward to (sometimes with unintentionally hilarious results) - even if that guy’s never laid a finger on the game itself. Game teams are often enormous, and it’s unlikely that the audience will be familiar with every hard worker who made a successful project happen. But marketing departments are apparently so terrified to let “the message” get out of their control that it’s very rare that the press is able to speak to a real, live designer - which means the audience probably never knows who that is. Why is this a problem? Other than the fact that individuals deserve credit for what they do, it may result in an under-valuation of games themselves; the danger of treating games strictly as a software product and not as the product of the creative and technical expertise of its development leadership means that many audiences will never never see games as anything other than - well, software products. Not art, not experiences, not human interaction, just shiny things in boxes that tend to sell units. This is challenging even to an audience who’s used to understanding and enjoying video games - when’s the last time it occurred to you that a video game was made by human beings? But it’s an even bigger problem for the future viability of the medium. We want mainstream audiences to be able to accept that games are as valuable as any other entertainment medium, firstly. Secondly, talent is miserable when it’s simply an interchangeable pair of hands assigned to get a product to ship, and the game reflects that. So please, game companies, let your title benefit from the input of individual spirit that feels valued. New Year’s Resolutions For Gamers Ditch The Pessimism: Ever notice that gamers seem to be much more enthusiastic about the things they hate than the things they like? Ever see a new game announcement where half of the comments say, “I hope this doesn’t suck?” - And those are just the optimists. Of course, no one should ever say that audiences have no right to criticize games, dislike them or discuss the reasons why something didn’t work for them. And there are probably some logical reasons why the game community on the internet seems to be so vitriolic and negative so much of the time. The industry hype cycle starts early - big promises and long waits for expensive new titles leads to expectations that can’t possibly be met, for one thing, so perhaps gamers can be forgiven for feeling cynical much of the time. The anonymity of the internet takes some credit, too - it’s a lot easier to build an echo chamber of the kind of ill conduct we can’t easily vent in real life, which could mean that the way people behave online isn’t a true reflection of their sentiment around video games at all. And many of our major titles are, to be fair, depressing - they feature dark environments, they ask you to kill things, or they feature narrative themes designed to prompt brooding and gut-wrenching as a shortcut to artistic integrity. But let’s work with the theory that gaming is a medium in its adolescence - that one day, we’ll see a greater diversity of genres, an inspiring range of experiences, and true social acceptance of the worthiness of gaming. If that’s true, then right now, we the passionate enthusiasts are the early adopters. We’re on the forefront. Do we want to be tearing down its shortcomings, or cheering on its successes? Think about it. Choose To Engage: Our expectations of games today have been somewhat shaped by games yesterday. We tend to enter a game with half of our expectations built from prior titles, and half of them built by early buzz, whether it’s positive or negative. We are promised an Enriching Experience, and with controller in hand, we sit and wait for it to be delivered. When the way we push buttons fails to yield an intellectual or emotional connection, we blame the game. But maybe part of enjoying a game is wanting to enjoy it. In our demand for interactivity, it seems it’s very possible to lose track of the fact that “interactivity” requires input from the player. Each of us is certainly entitled to his own taste - but who knows what we might be missing when we wait for the game to make that emotional connection rather than making it ourselves? For example, long cutscenes have fallen out of favor, so anytime we see one, we become frustrated. We want to play games, not watch them, comes the old refrain, and so we tap-tap-tap a button, hoping to skip. But sometimes, just trying to sit still for a minute can be an enlightening experience. Sometimes cutscenes are useless filler - but sometimes they’re expositions that offer opportunities for the player to relate the events of the game to their own emotions and experiences. Never know unless you try, right? It’s akin to reading a novel - if you skip pages just to get to the kinds of scenes that you find most interesting, you might be missing a learning experience, a moment that could unexpectedly touch your heart, or a chance to learn more about the book’s characters that would add additional meaning to its main plot. Of course, cutscenes are just one example. In general, as players, we could definitely benefit from a more open mind and a willingness to try and engage with the game world - an in-game choice, after all, is really just sets of ones and zeroes unless you are the one who decides it means something to you. The game can’t do it all for you. Embrace Innovation: There’s a reason sequels sell so well - people can rely on them. There’s little risk, as a purchaser, in something you know is going to be just more of something you already know you like. And again, everyone’s entitled to personal taste, of course. Still, much of the audience spends a lot of time clamoring for something “different” - but would we recognize it if it were right in front of our face? Different doesn’t always mean “better,” of course. There are plenty of attempts at innovating on design that end up poorly executed. There are plenty of earnest efforts to create compelling characters that just turn out to be annoying. But interestingly, it seems many of the titles that try the hardest to forge out in a new direction are the ones that make the least splash - they’re the sad gems buried in the holiday rush, or the cult favorites that no one else seems to “get.” Could it be we’re still fastened to our old ways of thinking, evaluating games in the dated “five categories” of a much simpler time? One lesson from 2008 was how stunningly diverse the catalog of available titles was - and how divided many critics were, and how hard it was for reviewers to arrive at a consensus of whether or not a game is “good.” Games are not simple anymore, period. Maybe the successes of 2009 will be even less easily-defined; the “formula” for success becomes less and less relevant and less and less predictable. We’ll no longer be able to evaluate games against a list of pre-defined genre traits, marking them positively or negatively based on how well they adhere to the expectations set by their predecessors. In other words, we’ll have to cultivate our appetite for innovation, and work on regarding experimentation as a positive to be studied, not a negative to be quashed just because it doesn’t adhere to expectations. We might enjoy games more that way, and even learn more about them. [Leigh Alexander is news director for Gamasutra, reviews games at Variety,and maintains her gaming blog, Sexy Videogameland. Her monthly column at Kotaku deals with cultural issues surrounding games and gamers. She can be reached at leighalexander1 AT gmail DOT com.]

P.E.N.I.S.es in the Workplace

01月 6th, 2009

Oh shit. Sorry…that phrase just happens to be foremost in my mind at the moment.I am sitting here at work, twiddling my ass, watching the clock. The bosses are gone of course, because they “have people coming in”. Well Hells Bells…don’t we all? If that is all it takes to go home early why was I not invited TO LEAVE? Oh…that’s right…because I don’t have a P.E.N.I.S.It has been such a special couple of weeks lately here at work. One special event was when one of the bosses mentioned in passing some statement about accountability in reference to me and my job. No point trying to explain here, suffice to say he is the most full of you-know-what person I have ever known.Everyone knows one, or worse still, has one. He knows everything. He has everything. He has done everything. He has been everywhere. I swear if I were to mention how bad my cramps were this month (and I wouldn’t) he would come up with some horror story about how much worse his were last month.You know the kind, they will come along and take credit for work that YOU did, or pick up on something you are working on and somehow SAVE THE EFFING DAY in the BIG bosses eyes.Anyway, accountability on my part has never been an issue in the nine years I have worked here. I have the pay raises and bonuses every year to prove that, but being the silent wuss that I am he can come along with one little sentence and stop me in my tracks for weeks. He preys on people like me…people who won’t stand up, people who don’t quite know how to tell anyone that he is taking credit for my shit. I watch him do it to others. I’ve heard him lie straight out and put the blame for some stupid shit on me – something that doesn’t even matter in the long run – and I don’t know how to approach it at all. So I don’t. Instead, I just grow a nice large ulcer.Speaking of pain in the asses…I have had some stomach virus for 5 days now. Nothing has stayed around in my belly long enough for 5 days to even get to know the wall paper in there. I don’t know how much weight I have lost, but I hope it stays off. I have worked through this of course. Well, I was out a day and a half, but otherwise I have sat here, bent over, rushing back and forth to the bathroom where the most hellacious sounds you have ever heard have broken the silence here. Oh…and when I came back from the one and a half days I absolutely couldn’t get off the potty long enough to get here…they had saved the trash and the dirty dishes in the break room for me. Ahhh what it must be like to have a P.E.N.I.S.Today, I HATE this place. I am so thankful to the Lord to have a job in this time when so many are losing theirs, but this place has begun to suck the life from me. I don’t have many options if I were to leave. I only make a decent wage now because I have been here for a while. I don’t have an education and no matter what skills you have, companies are looking for that piece of paper that I can’t hand them. So, for now, I guess I’ll just tell you all about my troubles here, and hope that slows the progress of the little entity in the lining of my belly. I wonder if I should name it?

“Are You an Exerciser or an Athlete? Part I” by Charles Staley

01月 6th, 2009

When I tell people that I don’t workout or exercise but that I train, they usually think that I’m trying to be some macho-type guy, but that’s not the case at all. Nothing could be farther from the truth. It’s just a matter of perspective and how you approach being fit and healthy.Well, once I came across this two-part article written by Charles Staley, the developer of the EDT (Escalating Density Training) System, which is something that I first heard of from strength coach Mike Mahler, I felt that I finally found someone to sum up exactly what I’ve been trying to explain.Basically, EDT allows you to do a large volume of work over a specified time. The key to this system is that you try and beat the number of reps you did for a particular lift the very next workout. Now, this increase the next workout can be as little as one extra rep, which is fine because they name of the game is gradual and progressive resistance. So, it’s good to have a training partner to count your reps. EDT is a system I’ve yet to practice, but I plan on having a ball with it once I start my mass building phase after my 12 day extreme cutting diet, Lyle style.OK, enjoy Charles’s article and decide which one you are. I’ll post Part II on Wednesday.”Are You an Exerciser or an Athlete? Part I” by Charles StaleyBy Charles Staley, B.Sc, MSSDirector, Staley Training SystemsProbably 90 percent of all American adults are sedentary, fat, and/or just generally soft and out of shape. The fact that you’re reading this probably means you’re in the remaining 10 percent, which is to your credit.When I look at the active minority however, it’s clear that 90 percent of them are what I call “exercisers.” Allow me to explain and define:Exercisers want to look better, and despite years of neglect and bad habits, they want it yesterday. They try to achieve this end through manipulating the law of thermodynamics. Eat fewer calories, burn more calories. In other words, create a caloric deficit and (hopefully) lose weight and be somebody.Athletes want to perform better, and despite years of hard training, they still see new PR’s in their future. They achieve this end through consistent and progressive training, directed toward a competitive goalMost exercisers assume that the more an exercise hurts, the more calories it must burn, and therefore, the better it is for you. Similarly, exercisers assume the worse a food tastes, the better it is for you, and if you buy into the law of thermodynamics, it’s not hard to see the kernel of truth in this assumption. Ultimately, being an exerciser is a hard way to go. The exerciser lifestyle is about denial, self-loathing, and guilt. You’ve got to make sure you put in enough punishment on the treadmill, and you’ve also gotta make sure you never eat anything that tastes good. No wonder people hate exercise as much as they hate dieting. I happen to hate both practices myself.There is a better way however, and that better way is to adopt the mindset and lifestyle of an athlete. Athletes, don’t exercise, they train. They don’t diet; they refuel. They don’t avoid, they seek. If you go into any Olympic weightlifting club, you’ll notice that they don’t do exercises, they do “the lifts.” (meaning, the snatch and clean & jerk). In fact, most weightlifters refer to their workouts as “practices” as in “I’m going to practice.” Exercisers are perpetually trying to “lose weight.” When a wrestler or MMA competitor needs to drop weight for a competition, they call it “cutting.” Notice how the former sounds negative and reactive, while the latter sounds positive and proactive?The biggest problem associated with having an “exerciser” mindset is that it compels people to make exercise choices that are contradictory to speed, strength, power, and generally, Type IIB physiology. Here’s an example:You read an article about “time under tension,” and since the author is a world-famous strength coach, you decide to give it a shot. On your next workout you decide to squat using a “4-1-2″ tempo, meaning a 4-second descent followed by a 1-second pause, and finally, a 2-second ascent. You quickly learn that “TUT” is a very painful experience, and since you associate pain with gain, you’re hooked. It’s not until 3-4 weeks later however, that you begin to realize that your agonizingly painful squat routine hasn’t put any beef on your quads or hams, and as far as strength goes, you actually feel weaker! Any motor-learning professor could tell you why…your 7-second reps dramatically reduce the tension on your working muscles, which in turn reduce Type IIB (fast twitch) fiber recruitment in favor of more slow twitch motor units. This sucks, because now you’re weaker and slower.You might assume that the athletic lifestyle is beyond your reach. But being an athlete isn’t the exclusive domain of elite performers. In fact, quite the contrary: by strict definition, most athletes are not elite! Instead, being an athlete is a lifestyle and a perspective. It’s the way you go about business in the gym. It’s a professional attitude, as opposed to an amateur one.The exerciser does it because he has to; the athlete does it because he wants to.Making the transition from exerciser to athlete is simple, but not necessarily easy. Next week, I’ll present 5 Critical Practices that’ll help you make the switch.

Year 2, Day 5: Call me a sinner, call me a saint

01月 6th, 2009

screamwithme has added a photo to the pool:
Tell me it’s over
I’ll still love you the same
Call me your favorite, call me the worst
Tell me it’s over
I don’t want you to hurt
It’s all that I can say
So, I’ll be on my way
I’ll always keep you inside, you healed my heart and my life
And you know I try
I feel like such a failure right now. Due to poor communication and lack of motivation, I’m being withdrawn from my American Government class. I mean, I can request the course right away. As soon as tomorrow. But apparently there’s a waiting list, meaning there is no telling when I’ll actually be able to take it. Normal students who actually go to school take Economics one semester, and American Government the next. Once I finish my Economics and Personal Fitness class within the next two weeks, I have to request an English class. Then when I can take more classes, I have to request two other electives. And if I’m not mistaken, I’m going to have to take another health/physical education class. Even though when I was at the actual high school, taking Life Management and then Personal Fitness counted as the full credit that I needed. But I never passed the latter, so I’m taking it now/passing it. Basically, I’m probably not going to finish school this year. If I do, I’ll be lucky.
I am so confused about all of this, and I don’t know what to do. I can’t drop out and just get my GED. I mean I could, but that would bother me for the rest of my life.
Anyone else in the mood for a mental breakdown?!
What am I supposed to do? Just take the courses, no matter how long it takes me? I don’t even know if I can do that! I mean, if I can I will. But what if I can’t..
By the way, I absolutely hate stupid cunts who think everything is about them. I hate girls in general. Definitely hate girls my age the most. Everyone is the same and annoying. Yeah, occasionally you run into a handful of girls who can actually think for themselves and can act like normal human beings. But I know plenty of people who are total attention whores and so immature that it’s pathetic. And some people have had the nerve to call me immature! Hah, at least you can have an intelligent conversation with me and can tell that I do have a brain that I’m very fond of using.
But obviously, being the spastic airhead gets you way more attention than being the normal girl. I will never understand why you didn’t pick me. Why numerous people chose the other girl over me. And this could lead into a completely new paragraph of self doubt and questioning that I don’t really feel like going into tonight.

Ahmed Faraz Dies in Islamabad

01月 6th, 2009

On August 25th, the celebrated Urdu poet Ahmed Faraz died in Islamabad at age 77 after a protracted illness. In Faraz Sahib not only have we lost an excellent ghazal poet but a courageous and honorable man whose consistent stance against Pakistani dictatorships will never be forgotten. He opposed military rule whether it came in the guise of a ruthless Islamist like Zia-ul-Haq or a self proclaimed “moderate” like Musharraf. To his credit he saw through veneers and opposed authoritarianism which has been the scourge of the Pakistani state since independence. As a poet he has long been acknowledged as one of the masters of modern Urdu ghazal but his return of the Hilal-e-Imtiaz in 2006 (Pakistan’s highest civilian honor) as a protest against Musharraf’s authoritarian rule once again demonstrated his lifelong commitment to the primacy of human rights and dignity.Rest in peace Faraz Sahib.Ranjish hi sahi dil hi dukhaane ke liye aaAa phir se mujhe chor ke jaane ke liye aaIk umr se hooN lazzat-e-girya se bhi mehroomAye rahat-e-jaaN mujh ko rulaane ke liye aaDawn had an obituary on Faraz Sahib the day after his death written by Mushir Anwar which sadly lifted several passages directly from Wikipedia (hat tip: Abbas Raza). However, today’s New York Times also has an obituary by Haresh Pandya which despite some elemantary errors does a good job of suveying Faraz Sahib’s life (e.g. Urdu poets whose work is both read and sung are not rare). I can always count on 3quarksdaily and the Raza family for wonderfully original content on Urdu literati. Today, there is a simple but lovely remembrance by Atiya Batool Khan on Faraz Sahib. (Azra Raza’s appreciation of Qurratulain Hyder that appeared on 3QD in August last year is one of the best personal pieces written about Aini Apa in English that I can find.)To remember Faraz Sahib what better way than to listen to the above mentioned “Ranjish hi sahi” beautifully sung by the inimitable Mehdi Hasan Sahib, the virtual creator of modern semi-classical ghazal singing.

Mark Twain, on bicycles.

01月 6th, 2009

Taming the Bicycleby Mark TwainI thought the matter over, and concluded I could do it. So I went down and bought a barrel of Pond’s Extract and a bicycle. The Expert came home with me to instruct me. We chose the back yard, for the sake of privacy, and went to work.Mine was not a full-grown bicycle, but only a colt — a fifty-inch, with the pedals shortened up to forty-eight — and skittish, like any other colt. The Expert explained the thing’s points briefly, then he got on its back and rode around a little, to show me how easy it was to do. He said that the dismounting was perhaps the hardest thing to learn, and so we would leave that to the last. But he was in error there. He found, to his surprise and joy, that all that he needed to do was to get me on to the machine and stand out of the way; I could get off, myself. Although I was wholly inexperienced, I dismounted in the best time on record. He was on that side, shoving up the machine; we all came down with a crash, he at the bottom, I next, and the machine on top.We examined the machine, but it was not in the least injured. This was hardly believable. Yet the Expert assured me that it was true; in fact, the examination proved it. I was partly to realize, then, how admirably these things are constructed. We applied some Pond’s Extract, and resumed. The Expert got on the other side to shove up this time, but I dismounted on that side; so the result was as before.The machine was not hurt. We oiled ourselves up again, and resumed. This time the Expert took up a sheltered position behind, but somehow or other we landed on him again.He was full of surprised admiration; said it was abnormal. She was all right, not a scratch on her, not a timber started anywhere. I said it was wonderful, while we were greasing up, but he said that when I came to know these steel spider-webs I would realize that nothing but dynamite could cripple them. Then he limped out to position, and we resumed once more. This time the Expert took up the position of short-stop, and got a man to shove up behind. We got up a handsome speed, and presently traversed a brick, and I went out over the top of the tiller and landed, head down, on the instructor’s back, and saw the machine fluttering in the air between me and the sun. It was well it came down on us, for that broke the fall, and it was not injured.Five days later I got out and was carried down to the hospital, and found the Expert doing pretty fairly. In a few more days I was quite sound. I attribute this to my prudence in always dismounting on something soft. Some recommend a feather bed, but I think an Expert is better.The Expert got out at last, brought four assistants with him. It was a good idea. These four held the graceful cobweb upright while I climbed into the saddle; then they formed in column and marched on either side of me while the Expert pushed behind; all hands assisted at the dismount.The bicycle had what is called the ‘wabbles’, and had them very badly. In order to keep my position, a good many things were required of me, and in every instance the thing required was against nature. Against nature, but not against the laws of nature. That is to say, that whatever the needed thing might be, my nature, habit, and breeding moved me to attempt it in one way, while some immutable and unsuspected law of physics required that it be done in just the other way. I perceived by this how radically and grotesquely wrong had been the lifelong education of my body and members. They were steeped in ignorance; they knew nothing - nothing which it could profit them to know. For instance, if I found myself falling to the right, I put the tiller hard down the other way, by a quite natural impulse, and so violated a law, and kept on going down. The law required the opposite thing - the big wheel must be turned in the direction in which you are falling. It is hard to believe this, when you are told it . And not merely hard to believe it, but impossible; it is opposed to all your notions. And it is just as hard to do it, after you do come to believe it. Believing it, and knowing by the most convincing proof that it is true, does not help it: you can’t any more do it that you could before; you can neither force nor persuade yourself to do it at first. The intellect has to come to the front, now. It has to teach the limbs to discard their old education and adopt the new.The steps of one’s progress are distinctly marked. At the end of each lesson he knows he has acquired something, and he also knows what that something is, and likewise that it will stay with him. It is not like studying German, where you mull along, in a groping, uncertain way, for thirty years; and at last, just as you think you’ve got it, they spring the subjunctive on you, and there you are. No — and I see now, plainly enough, that the great pity about the German language is, that you can’t fall off it and hurt yourself. There is nothing like that feature to make you attend strictly to business. But I also see, by what I have learned of bicycling, that the right and only sure way to learn German is by the bicycling method. That is to say, take a grip on one villainy of it at a time, and learn it — not ease up and shirk to the next, leaving that one half learned.When you have reached the point in bicycling where you can balance the machine tolerably fairly and propel it and steer it, then comes your next task — how to mount it. You do it in this way: you hop along behind it on your right foot, resting the other on the mounting-peg, and grasping the tiller with your hands. At the word, you rise on the peg, stiffen your left leg, hang your other one around in the air in a general and indefinite way, lean your stomach against the rear of the saddle, and then fall off, maybe on one side, maybe on the other; but you fall off. You get up and do it again; and once more; and then several times.By this time you have learned to keep your balance; and also to steer without wrenching the tiller out by the roots (I say tiller because it is a tiller; “handle-bar” is a lamely descriptive phrase). So you steer along, straight ahead, a little while, then you rise forward, with a steady strain, bringing your right leg, and then your body, into the saddle, catch your breath, fetch a violent hitch this way and then that, and down you go again.But you have ceased to mind the going down by this time; you are getting to light on one foot or the other with considerable certainty. Six more attempts and six more falls make you perfect. You land in the saddle comfortably, next time, and stay there — that is, if you can be content to let your legs dangle, and leave the pedals alone a while; but if you grab at once for the pedals, you are gone again. You soon learn to wait a little and perfect your balance before reaching for the pedals; then the mounting-art is acquired, is complete, and a little practice will make it simple and easy to you, though spectators ought to keep off a rod or two to one side, along at first, if you have nothing against them.And now you come to the voluntary dismount; you learned the other kind first of all. It is quite easy to tell one how to do the voluntary dismount; the words are few, the requirement simple, and apparently undifficult; let your left pedal go down till your left leg is nearly straight, turn your wheel to the left, and get off as you would from a horse. It certainly does sound exceedingly easy; but it isn’t. I don’t know why it isn’t, but it isn’t. Try as you may, you don’t get down as you would from a horse, you get down as you would from a house afire. You make a spectacle of yourself every time.During eight days I took a daily lesson of an hour and a half. At the end of this twelve working-hours’ apprenticeship I was graduated — in the rough. I was pronounced competent to paddle my own bicycle without outside help. It seems incredible, this celerity of acquirement. It takes considerably longer than that to learn horseback-riding in the rough.Now it is true that I could have learned without a teacher, but it would have been risky for me, because of my natural clumsiness. The self-taught man seldom knows anything accurately, and he does not know a tenth as much as he could have known if he had worked under teachers; and, besides, he brags, and is the means of fooling other thoughtless people into going and doing as he himself had done. There are those who imagine that the unlucky accidents of life - life’s “experiences” - are in some way useful to us. I wish I could find out how. I never knew one of them to happen twice. They always change off and swap around and catch you on your inexperienced side. If personal experience can be worth anything as an education, it wouldn’t seem likely that you could trip Methuselah; and yet if that old person could come back here it is more than likely that one of the first things he would do would be to take hold of one of these electric wires and tie himself all up in a knot. Now the surer thing and the wiser thing would be for him to ask somebody whether it was a good thing to take hold of. But that would not suit him; he would be one of the self-taught kind that go by experience; he would want to examine for himself. And he would find, for his instruction, that the coiled patriarch shuns the electric wire; and it would be useful to him, too, and would leave his education in quite a complete and rounded-out condition, till he should come again, some day, and go to bouncing a dynamite-can around to find out what was in it.But we wander from the point. However, get a teacher; it saves much time and Pond’s Extract.Before taking final leave of me, my instructor inquired concerning my physical strength, and I was able to inform him that I hadn’t any. He said that that was a defect which would make up-hill wheeling pretty difficult for me at first; but he also said the bicycle would soon remove it. The contrast between his muscles and mine was quite marked. He wanted to test mine, so I offered my biceps — which was my best. It almost made him smile. He said, “It is pulpy, and soft, and yielding, and rounded; it evades pressure, and glides from under the fingers; in the dark a body might think it was an oyster in a rag.” Perhaps this made me look grieved, for he added, briskly: “Oh, that’s all right; you needn’t worry about that; in a little while you can’t tell it from a petrified kidney. Just go right along with your practice; you’re all right.”Then he left me, and I started out alone to seek adventures. You don’t really have to seek them — that is nothing but a phrase — they come to you.I chose a reposeful Sabbath-day sort of a back street which was about thirty yards wide between the curbstones. I knew it was not wide enough; still, I thought that by keeping strict watch and wasting no space unnecessarily I could crowd through.Of course I had trouble mounting the machine, entirely on my own responsibility, with no encouraging moral support from the outside, no sympathetic instructor to say, “Good! now you’re doing well — good again — don’t hurry — there, now, you’re all right — brace up, go ahead.” In place of this I had some other support. This was a boy, who was perched on a gate-post munching a hunk of maple sugar.He was full of interest and comment. The first time I failed and went down he said that if he was me he would dress up in pillows, that’s what he would do. The next time I went down he advised me to go and learn to ride a tricycle first. The third time I collapsed he said he didn’t believe I could stay on a horse-car. But next time I succeeded, and got clumsily under way in a weaving, tottering, uncertain fashion, and occupying pretty much all of the street. My slow and lumbering gait filled the boy to the chin with scorn, and he sung out, “My, but don’t he rip along!” Then he got down from his post and loafed along the sidewalk, still observing and occasionally commenting. Presently he dropped into my wake and followed along behind. A little girl passed by, balancing a wash-board on her head, and giggled, and seemed about to make a remark, but the boy said, rebukingly, “Let him alone, he’s going to a funeral.”I had been familiar with that street for years, and had always supposed it was a dead level; but it was not, as the bicycle now informed me, to my surprise. The bicycle, in the hands of a novice, is as alert and acute as a spirit-level in the detecting of delicate and vanishing shades of difference in these matters. It notices a rise where your untrained eye would not observe that one existed; it notices any decline which water will run down. I was toiling up a slight rise, but was not aware of it. It made me tug and pant and perspire; and still, labor as I might, the machine came almost to a standstill every little while. At such times the boy would say: “That’s it! take a rest - there ain’t no hurry. They can’t hold the funeral without you.”Stones were a bother to me. Even the smallest ones gave me a panic when I went over them. I could hit any kind of a stone, no matter how small, if I tried to miss it; and of course at first I couldn’t help trying to do that. It is but natural. It is part of the ass that is put in us all, for some inscrutable reason.I was at the end of my course, at last, and it was necessary for me to round to. This is not a pleasant thing, when you undertake it for the first time on your own responsibility, and neither is it likely to succeed. Your confidence oozes away, you fill steadily up with nameless apprehensions, every fiber of you is tense with a watchful strain, you start a cautious and gradual curve, but your squirmy nerves are all full of electric anxieties, so the curve is quickly demoralized into a jerky and perilous zigzag; then suddenly the nickel-clad horse takes the bit in its mouth and goes slanting for the curbstone, defying all prayers and all your powers to change its mind — your heart stands still, your breath hangs fire, your legs forget to work, straight on you go, and there are but a couple of feet between you and the curb now. And now is the desperate moment, the last chance to save yourself; of course all your instructions fly out of your head, and you whirl your wheel away from the curb instead of toward it, and so you go sprawling on that granite-bound inhospitable shore. That was my luck; that was my experience. I dragged myself out from under the indestructible bicycle and sat down on the curb to examine.I started on the return trip. It was now that I saw a farmer’s wagon poking along down toward me, loaded with cabbages. If I needed anything to perfect the precariousness of my steering, it was just that. The farmer was occupying the middle of the road with his wagon, leaving barely fourteen or fifteen yards of space on either side. I couldn’t shout at him — a beginner can’t shout; if he opens his mouth he is gone; he must keep all his attention on his business. But in this grisly emergency, the boy came to the rescue, and for once I had to be grateful to him. He kept a sharp lookout on the swiftly varying impulses and inspirations of my bicycle, and shouted to the man accordingly:”To the left! Turn to the left, or this jackass’ll run over you!” The man started to do it. “No, to the right, to the right! Hold on! that won’t do! — to the left! — to the right! — to the left! — right! left — ri — Stay where you are, or you’re a goner!”And just then I caught the off horse in the starboard and went down in a pile. I said, “Hang it! Couldn’t you see I was coming?”"Yes, I see you was coming, but I couldn’t tell which way you was coming. Nobody could — now, could they? You couldn’t yourself — now, could you? So what could I do?”There was something in that, and so I had the magnanimity to say so. I said I was no doubt as much to blame as he was.Within the next five days I achieved so much progress that the boy couldn’t keep up with me. He had to go back to his gate-post, and content himself with watching me fall at long range.There was a row of low stepping-stones across one end of the street, a measured yard apart. Even after I got so I could steer pretty fairly I was so afraid of those stones that I always hit them. They gave me the worst falls I ever got in that street, except those which I got from dogs. I have seen it stated that no expert is quick enough to run over a dog; that a dog is always able to skip out of his way. I think that that may be true; but I think that the reason he couldn’t run over the dog was because he was trying to. I did not try to run over any dog. But I ran over every dog that came along. I think it makes a great deal of difference. If you try to run over the dog he knows how to calculate, but if you are trying to miss him he does not know how to calculate, and is liable to jump the wrong way every time. It was always so in my experience. Even when I could not hit a wagon I could hit a dog that came to see me practise. They all liked to see me practise, and they all came, for there was very little going on in our neighborhood to entertain a dog. It took time to learn to miss a dog, but I achieved even that.I can steer as well as I want to, now, and I will catch that boy out one of these days and run over him if he doesn’t reform.Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live.’What Is Man? and Other Essays’ (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1917)We’ve read that Twain himself never offered ‘Taming of the Bicycle’ for publication.

General Motors Bailout

01月 6th, 2009

Op-Ed by John Addison (11/17/08). On September 24, Congress approved a $25 billion bailout for GM, Ford, and Chrysler. “It seemed like a lot when we first started pushing this,” says Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, one of the bill’s sponsors. “Suddenly, it seems so small.” The three troubled automakers are already back in Washington D.C. asking for another $25 billion. A couple of weeks ago, GM said that the future of our nation depended on it getting added billions so that it could buy Chrysler. GM has changed its mind. It just wants taxpayers to give the Detroit three another $25 billion. The problem is that the total of $50 billion is paid by taxpayers like you and me. Congress would do well to have some national goals for the $50 billion, not goals set by auto lobbyists. Goals include America’s need to become competitive with the world if we hope to create more jobs and end this recession. Workers need help by either keeping their jobs or by getting new jobs. Americans need cars that cost less at the pump and better alternatives to always using a car. America needs to be energy secure, not desperately dependent on oil. To meet these goals, several alternatives are being considered: Another $25 billion with no strings attached.Let GM reorganize under Chapter 11 bankruptcy.Boost consumer auto purchases with tax credits for buying vehicles with excellent fuel economy. Invest the $25 billion in rail and transit. When Chrysler got its 1980 loan guarantee, Lee Iacocca cut his annual salary to a dollar and slashed the wages of other top workers by 10 percent. The tax payers never paid a cent. It was a $1.5 billion loan guarantee. This time around, Chrysler will be fine. Chrysler President Jim Press, when talking in September at a Western Automotive Journalist meeting, stated, “We need a new business model based on one word – Reality.” The new management team at Chrysler inherited a 4 million car per year overhead with sales falling to one million per year. Chrysler is privately owned by Cerberus Capital Management. Chrysler has been actively downsizing to be smaller, agile and profitable. Ford is also moving to a business model that matches the name of its best selling car – Focus. In recently discussing its third quarter results, Ford stated that it remains on track to achieve $5 billion in cost reductions in North America by the end of 2008 compared with 2005. After a quarterly pre-tax loss of $2.7 billion, Ford had overall liquidity of $29.6 billion. The company promised shareholders further cost cuts and cash improvements. In his November 17 Wall Street Journal article, Michael Levine discusses why Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the best option for GM. Chapter 11 would allow GM to be more competitive with Toyota, which now has now the world leader in market share. Over the years, GM has lost about two-thirds of its market share. Only with bankruptcy can GM be free of restrictions that prevent it from being competitive. It has 7,000 dealers compared to Toyota’s 1,500 successful dealers. GM has enormous pension and health care costs that add thousands to the cost of cars. The burden is so great, that GM needs SUVs to make money and sees no margin in fuel efficient cars. Yet, it is fuel efficient cars that customers are now buying. If GM reorganizes under bankruptcy, creditors will be forced to give it breathing room and paralyzing restrictions will be removed. Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary, wrote on November 11, “When a big company that gets into trouble is more valuable living than dead, there used to be a well-established legal process for reorganizing it - called chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. Under it, creditors took some losses, shareholders even bigger ones, some managers’ heads rolled. Companies cleaned up their books and got a fresh start. And taxpayers didn’t pay a penny. In exchange for government aid, the Big Three’s creditors, shareholders, and executives should be required to accept losses as large as they’d endure under chapter 11, and the UAW should agree to some across-the-board wage and benefit cuts.” Al Gore, in his November 9 NY Times Op-Ed identifies a major opportunity, “We should help America’s automobile industry (not only the Big Three but the innovative new startup companies as well) to convert quickly to plug-in hybrids that can run on the renewable electricity that will be available as the rest of this plan matures. In combination with the unified grid, a nationwide fleet of plug-in hybrids would also help to solve the problem of electricity storage.” Now law, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 gives tax credits exceeding $7,000 for the purchase of plug-in hybrids. President-elect Obama, when campaigning, favored expanded use of tax credits to speed the transition to a competitive auto industry that makes clean cars. Consumer vehicle spending could be boosted now by expanding the offering to include a $2,000 tax credit for vehicles getting over 35 miles per gallon and up to $10,000 for zero-emission vehicles. Auto industry sales would immediately jump without a $25 billion give away. In the seventies, I left my job with a major Detroit corporation, Burroughs, then the second largest computer firm. At the time, all makers of mainframe computers were in trouble, including IBM. If the government had done a massive bailout and protected their businesses, the United States would not have transitioned into the global giant of information technology. Lacking a bailout, IBM reinvented themselves into a global leader in IT services with a deep new patent portfolio. Burroughs became Unisys. Honeywell redefined itself. GE exited the computer field. An industry thrived instead of died. The transition made the United States the global leader in the Internet and technology innovation, creating millions of jobs. Big corporations resist change, yet change they must. To grow and be profitable, the United States transportation industry must be innovative and responsive to customers. Car customers are voting with their pocketbooks. The average car owner spends $8,000 on their car. The average household with two cars spends $16,000. People are demanding fuel economy. They have stopped buying vehicles with lousy mileage. They want hybrids that deliver over 40 miles per gallon. There is a pent-up demand for millions of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids. Only a smaller innovative customer-oriented GM can create permanent jobs. Yes, a GM bankruptcy reorganization could lead to the short-term loss of over 100,000 jobs at GM, its suppliers, and some of its dealers. These laid-off workers, however, could be part of a million new workers. Federal government tax credits could be given to any company hiring laid-off auto workers. Community colleges could be funded in Michigan and other states to retrain workers for jobs of the future. $25 billion invested in public transportation would create over one million new jobs in the United States. The America Public Transportation Association has learned that every $1 billion invested in public transit capital projects generates 30,000 jobs, and the same amount invested in transit operations generates 60,000 jobs. U.S. citizens want better public transportation as ridership soars to 11 billion this year. This November, voters across the country in 16 states approved 23 measures out of 32 state and local public transit ballot initiatives, authorizing expenditures approximating $75 billion. Clean Fleet Report Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid plans to move forward with a bill that would give the auto industry access to the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program set up by the government in October to help ailing banks and other financial firms. As Ben Franklin observed, “Great haste makes great waste.” Congress may release the total $50 billion by Thanksgiving. Such haste sends all taxpayers a message, “Enjoy this turkey. You can pay for it later with interest.” John Addison publishes the Clean Fleet Report.Content provided by and all rights reserved to CleantechBlog.com. Also check out http://www.cleantech.org